Uncategorized

Stewards need to rethink how they pay for the Blue Box

One of the prime aims of the Ontario government when it passed the  Waste Diversion Act of 2002 was to regulate and secure industry funding for the province’s popular Blue Box program. The deal, a typical political compromise, was for Blue Box financial responsibility to be shared 50/50 between industry stewards and municipalities. The hoped-for

Stewards need to rethink how they pay for the Blue Box Read More »

Boxes, boxboard, paperboard, folding cartons, cardboard: whatever you call it, we have them covered

We have just launched a new website on the environmental attributes of paper boxes, but boy did we have a time before settling on what exactly to call it. You wouldn’t think there could be so many different names for what basically is a similar type of packaging material, but it’s a fact. There’s boxes,

Boxes, boxboard, paperboard, folding cartons, cardboard: whatever you call it, we have them covered Read More »

Plastics’ burning ambition and paper’s feedstock supply

The plastic industry has made no secret of the fact that it would like to burn over a million tonnes of currently “non-recycled” plastics in Ontario alone[1] . In strategic terms this would remove a major solid waste problem (some 73% of residential plastic packaging in Ontario, for example, ends up in landfill)[2] , while

Plastics’ burning ambition and paper’s feedstock supply Read More »

Upstream misses the boat

There’s no question that the folks at the US-based environmental group, Upstream, have their hearts in the right place. We just wish they would get all of their facts straight. The group recently launched a wide-ranging campaign against packaging waste, including a section on what it calls paper-based “consumer” packaging. Upstream defines this as pretty

Upstream misses the boat Read More »

Scroll to Top